S.Nooril Ameen v. A.Arun
BAIL SLIP THE APPELLANT HEREIN VIZ., S.NOORIL AMEEN, ACCUSED IN CC.NO.6333/10 ON THE FILE OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE(FAST TRACK COURT NO.IIII), SAIDAPET, CHENNAI WAS DIRECTED TO BE RELEASED ON BAIL AS PER ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED 5.12.13 IN MP.NO.1/13 IN CRL.RC.NO.1503/13.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 23.01.2018 C O R A M The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Crl.R.C.No.1503 of 2013 S.Nooril Ameen .. Petitioner/Accused Vs.
A.Arun .. Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Revision filed under section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner dated 05.11.2013 made in C.A.No.105 of 2012 on the file of the VI Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai by confirming the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner dated 07.05.2012 made in C.C.No.6333 of 2010 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court No.III), Saidapet, Chennai by allowing the Criminal Revision Case.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kumarasamy For Respondent : Mr.Murali
O R D E R
This revision arises against the judgment dated 05.11.2013 passed by learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in C.A.No.105 of 2012 confirming the conviction passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court No.III), Saidapet, Chennai in C.C.No.6333 of 2010 dated 07.05.2012.
2. By consent of both parties, this matter was referred to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras, by order dated 08.11.2017. Pursuant to the negotiations, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the parties have arrived at a mutual agreeable settlement and a report was sent by the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre in Mediation Case No.1304/2014 dated 04.12.2017, attaching the terms of settlement.
3. Heard, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
4. In view of the settlement arrived at between parties, the Criminal Revision Case shall stand allowed. Accordingly, the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act shall stand compounded. Petitioner shall stand acquitted in the case. Fine amount, if any, paid by the petitioner shall be refunded to him.
5. The petitioner is directed to deposit the final settlement amount less the amount already deposited to the credit of C.C.No.6333 of 2010 and the respondent is permitted withdraw the said amount. It is seen that the petitioner has deposited 50% of the agreed amount and respondent is entitled the withdraw the same.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ub To 1.The VI Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2.The Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court No.III), Saidapet, Chennai.
3.The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai 4.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras +1cc to Mr.R.Murali, Advocate Sr.No.4985 +1cc to Mr.S.Janarthanan, Advocate Sr.No.5049 KGK(CO) sm:14.2.2018 Crl.R.C.No.1503 of 2013 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/