Madras High CourtCRL OP/25815/2015closed

Mrs.Kalyani v. The State Rep By

2015-11-24Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.11.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.25815 of 2015 Mrs.Kalyani ... Petitioner Vs

1. The State, Rep. by its Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2. The State, Rep. by its Inspector of Police, Ponneri Police Station, Ponneri,Thiruvallur.

... Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in pursuant to representation dated 28.09.2015 on the file of the first respondent, the Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District except due process of law.

For Petitioner :

Mr.X.Selvam Sounder For respondent :

Mr.C.Emalias Addl. Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The present criminal original petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in pursuant to representation dated 28.09.2015 on the file of the first respondent, the Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District except due process of law.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police is frequently calling the petitioner under the guise of enquiry in respect of the complaint lodged https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

against her son. So far as this petitioner is concerned, she is no way connected with any offence. Thus, she sought for a direction to the second respondent not to harass her.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that totally 32 persons have lodged complaint as against the son of the petitioner, namely, V.Vellapandyan stating that the said Vellapandyan was running a business concern, namely, M/s.Eswari Motors. He collected amount from 32 persons and cheated them. Now, his whereabouts were not known. Hence, for the purpose of enquiry, the petitioner was called for by the respondents. Absolutely, there is no intention on the part of the respondents to harass the petitioner.

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am of the opinion that there is no need to give any specific direction to the respondent police. Hence, the present criminal original petition is closed.

Sd/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CO) /TRUE COPY/ SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR kua To 1.The Superintendent of Police, For The State,Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, For The State,Ponneri Police Station, Ponneri,Thiruvallur.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.25815 of 2015 CO-GJ JD 15/12/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/