E.Ramesh v. The Management Of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.08.2024 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN and W.M.P.No.23617 of 2024 E.Ramesh ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Management of M/s.Leaap International Pvt Ltd, No.46, 1st Floor, Orient Court, Rajaji Road, Chennai - 600 001.
2.The Management of M/s. Leaap RoRo Pvt Ltd, No.53-55, 1st Floor, Orient Court, Rajaji Road, Chennai - 600 001.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the Orders of the I Additional Labour Court, Chennai dated 31.01.2024 passed in I.A.Nos. 6, 7 and 8 of 2023 in I.D.No.137 of 2015 and to quash the above orders. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 : Mr. S.Saiprasad Page No. 1 of 4
for M/s.Sai Raj Association For R2 : Mr. R.Jayaprakash
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the orders passed in I.A.Nos.6, 7 and 8 of 2023 in I.D.No.137 of 2015 dated 31.01.2024, on the file of I Additional Labour Court, Chennai. The I.A.Nos. 6, 7 and 8 of 2023 are filed by the petitioner herein to reopen, recall and summon certain documents before the Labour Court. By way of common impugned orders dated 31.01.2024, the Labour Court has dismissed all the I.As. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that, this Court had earlier dismissed the Writ Petition No.12055 of 2024 on 30.04.2024, which is also filed for the similar relief to quash the order of dismissal of three interlocutory applications to re-open the petitioner's side evidence, recalling of witnesses and to call for certain documents.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Page No. 2 of 4
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that main industrial dispute in I.D.No.137 of 2015 was dismissed by I Additional Labour Court, Chennai on 31.01.2024. Once, I.D.No.137 of 2015 has already been disposed of, the writ petition filed challenging the orders passed in I.A.Nos.6, 7 and 8 of 2023 in I.D.No.137 of 2015 has become infructuous. Perhaps, since I.D.No.137 of 2015 was disposed of, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.
5. In view of the above, the relief sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected WMP is closed. 02.08.2024 (2/5) Index :
Yes/No Speaking Order :
Yes/No :
Yes/No nsl To The I Additional Labour Court, Chennai.
Page No. 3 of 4
DR.D.NAGARJUN , J.
nsl and W.M.P.No.23617 of 2024 02.08.2024 (2/5) Page No. 4 of 4