M.Arputham v. S.Lakshmi

A.Nos. 2207 and 2208 of 2025 and C.S. No. 448 of 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN A.Nos. 2207 and 2208 of 2025 and C.S. No. 448 of 2011 M.Arputham ... Applicant in A.Nos. 2207 and 2208 of 2025 Vs.

1.S.Lakshmi and others ... Respondents in A.Nos. 2207 and 2208 of 2025 For Applicant :

Mr.P.Anbarasan (in both Applications) For Respondents :

Mr.S.Ravichandran (D2) (in both Applications) Dr.R.Gouri (D1) C O M M O N O R D E R These applications have been filed to reopen the evidence of PW1 and to recall PW1 for further examination. In the affidavits filed in support of the Judges Summons, it had been contended that the evidence https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Nos. 2207 and 2208 of 2025 and C.S. No. 448 of 2011 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

Maya of PW1 had been tendered and completed after cross-examination, but later, there was an amendment to the plaint, which necessitates the evidence to be reopen and further evidence to be adduced.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents also.

3. The applications stand allowed.

11.06.2025 Maya A.Nos. 2207 and 2208 of 2025 and C.S. No. 448 of 2011 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis