Pakirisamy v. The Tashildar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.06.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.16411 of 2017 Pakirisamy ... Petitioner Vs.
The Tashildar, Kezhivelur, Nagapattinam District.
... Respondent PRAYER:
Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2017 and issue patta. For Petitioner :Mr.G.Kadhiresan for Mr.A.Sundaravadhavanam For Respondent :Mr.Era premnath, Government Advocate.
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider his representation dated 15.04.2017 for the issuance of patta.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2017, the respondent has not passed any order so far.
3.Mr.Era Premnath, the learned Government Advocate, taking notice for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2017, and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS II ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar mfa/rg To The Tashildar, Kezhivelur,Nagapattinam District.
+1cc to Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan,Advocate sr.45518 +1cc to Government Pleader,High Court, Madras.sr.45868 W.P.No.16411 of 2017 vgII(co) ss(12/7/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/