Mr.B.Hemadoss, v. The Inspector General Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No. 24074 of 2018 B.Hemadoss .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai-600 028.

2.The District Registrar (Administration), North Chennai, Chennai-600 108.

3.Periathoppu Grama Podhu Nala Sangam rep. by its President Mr.Sankar 4.Periathoppu Grama V.O.C.Podhu Nala Trust rep. by its President Mr.M.Mani .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to conduct an enquiry against the illegal transfer of administration and properties of the third respondent Sangam to the fourth respondent Trust and consequently to take appropriate action against them in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Sajeevkesan For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2

ORDER

By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2.The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to conduct an enquiry against the illegal transfer of administration and properties of the third respondent Sangam to the fourth respondent Trust and consequently to take appropriate action against them in accordance with law. 3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 19.02.2018 claiming the relief as prayed in this writ petition, but, the said representation is yet to be disposed of by the second respondent. However, the learned counsel submitted that it would suffice, if the said representation made by the petitioner is directed to be considered by the second respondent, on merits.

4.Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents 1 and 2, submitted that the second respondent be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and

pass orders in accordance with law.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2018 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 14.09.2018 Index: Yes/No vga R.MAHADEVAN, J.

vga To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai-600 028.

2.The District Registrar (Administration), North Chennai, Chennai-600 108.

WP.No.24074 of 2018 14.09.2018