A.Venkataraman v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

DATED: 31.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH W.P.No.13955 of 2018 A.Venkataraman

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Tashildar, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Management of Jai Parameswari Transport, No.556, Raj Mahal Complex, Bye Pass Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

...Respondents

PRAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to recover the dues payable by the 3rd respondent to this petitioner which amounts to Rs.3,38,595.55 as per the orders of this Court with interest at 24% per annum. For Petitioner : Ms.R.Poornima For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Ganesan, Government Advocate For R3 : No Appearance

ORDER

Today, when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the entire outstanding dues have been paid to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the submission made, no effective orders can be passed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar hvk To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Tashildar, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.5997 W.P.No.13955 of 2018 SS(CO) SB(10/02/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/