M.Sankaran v. The State By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.11985 of 2021
1. M.Sankaran
2. Marimuthu ... Petitioners Vs.
The State Represented by :- The Inspector of Police, Vaimedu Police Station, Nagapattinam District.
(Crime No.45 of 2018) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.45 of 2018 pending on the file of the respondent police.
For petitioners : Mr.V.R.Anna Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl side)
O R D E R
The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 498, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC in Cr.No.45 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners scolded the defacto complainant in filthy language and threatened her to kill. The respondent police have registered FIR based on complaint given by the defacto complainant.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and the petitioners are not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they are no way connected in this case. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that no one sustained injuries.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that no one sustained injuries, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedaranyam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 12/07/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDARANYAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAIMEDU POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S.V.R.ANNAGANDHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges S.R. NO. 7283 CRL OP.11985/2021 Date :12/07/2021 RW 23/07/2021