Madras High CourtCRL OP/12057/2021dismissed

Ragupathi v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-07-14Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of July Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.12057 of 2021 RAGUPATHI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs State through, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH (CCB), TIRUPPUR CITY.

CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S/.R.RAJPRABHU Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E. PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 420 of I.P.C in Crime No.11 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is working as custodian in CMS Infosys at Tiruppur, his nature of work is to get money from the wallet of the CMS Infosys and to fill in various Bank ATMs, as per the direction given by the CMS Infosys officials. While so during audit it was found that there is a lack of Rs.30,00,000/- in the accounts. Hence, the officials of CMS Infosys registered a case against the petitioner before the law enforcing registered the case against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he was regular in his work. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate submits that there was shortfall of Rs.30,00,000/- in the accounts of the petitioner's company, for which the petitioner is responsible. Hence he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the nature of offence committed by the petitioner and the amount involved https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

is very high, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly this Criminal Original petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 14/07/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH (CCB), TIRUPPUR CITY.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S/.R.RAJPRABHU Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.12057/2021 Date :14/07/2021 INBA 23/07/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/