← Library
Madras High CourtCRL A/375/2025dismissed as infructuous

Noorudeen @ Rafi @ Ismail @ Nayeem @ Sheik Maideen v. The Union Of India Rep.By Its, The Deputy Superintendent Of Police /

2025-09-25Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.09.2025 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Noorudeen @ Rafi @ Ismail @ Nayeem @ Sheik Maideen ... Appellant/Accused -vsThe Union of India, Rep. by its The Deputy Superintendent of Police / National Investigation Agency, Chennai.

... Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 21 of NIA Act to set aside the judgment and order in Cr.M.P.No.155 of 2025 dated 21.03.2025 in Spl.S.C.No.15 of 2022 on the file of Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial for Bomb Blast and POTA Cases) Chennai at Poonamallee, Chennai-56 and enlarge the petitioner on bail. For Appellant : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.R.Karthikeyan Spl. Public Prosecutor *****

J U D G M E N T

(By J.Nisha Banu,J.) Challenging the dismissal of the bail petition by the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial for Bomb Blast and POTA Cases) Chennai at Poonamallee, the appellant is 1/4

before this Court.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent that the appellant was an Under-Trial Prisoner and faced trial in Spl.S.C.No.15 of 2022. After a fullfledged trial, the appellant has been convicted on 13.08.2025 and therefore, the question of consideration of bail to the appellant does not arise. It was prayed that the present appeal may be dismissed as infructuous. The said submission has not been refuted by the learned counsel for the appellant.

3. In view of the above submissions, we are of the view that nothing survives for further adjudication in this appeal. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

(J.N.B.J.,) (S.S,J.,) 25.09.2025 Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ar 2/4

To:

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police / National Investigation Agency, The Union of India, Chennai.

2. The Special Public Prosecutor for NIA cases, High Court, Madras.

J.NISHA BANU, J.

3/4

AND S.SOUNTHAR, J.

ar 25.09.2025 4/4