← Library
Madras High CourtArb Appln/570/2025dismissed for not pressed

M/S Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd Represented By Its Authorized Signatory Mr D Arjun v. M/S Shubhanga Technology

2025-07-07Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Registered Office at 'Chola Crest'

C54 & 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-600032 Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.D.Arjun ... Applicant Vs.

1.M/s.Shubhanga Technology Ground Floor No.81, 18th Cross Raghavendra Nagar Thiagalarapalya Main Road Industrial Area Stage 2 Bangalore Urban - 560 058.

2. Sadanand Vigneshwar Hegde

3. Namita Satyanarayan Hegde

...Respondents

PRAYER: Arbitration Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules read with Section 9(ii)(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order of appointing an

advocate commissioner to seize and deliver the assets as detailed in schedule hereunder is available at respondent's premises or wherever found and permit the advocate commissioner to obtain police aid and to break open the premises and hand over the same to the applicant. S.

No.

Asset Manufactu rer No. of Units Invoice Value INR Total Margin INR Total Finance Amount INR 1.

LML-Vertical Machining Center Model VML - 50 with Fanuc CNC System Consisting of the following standard accessories Lokesh Machines Ltd.

31,27,000/- 6,25,400/- 25,01,600/- 2.

Electra 2D Height Master Model Ultima M with Standard scope of supply Electronica EMS 2,35,410/- 94,164/- 1,41,246/- 3.

Insurance - Machinery Premium Amt 19,819/- 4.

Insurance - Life Premium Amt 36,145/- Total 33,62,410/- 7,19,564/- 26,98,810/- For Applicant : Ms.K.Indumathi

O R D E R

Till date the Advocate Commissioner has not repossessed the vehicles /equipments. No useful purpose would be served, if this application is allowed to be kept pending.

2. Therefore, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks liberty for the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for the very same relief whenever the vehicles /equipments are located. 3.Accordingly, this application is closed. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to file fresh applications seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner once the vehicles /equipments are located. While considering such fresh application, this Court shall consider retaining the very same Advocate Commissioner, who was appointed in this application, since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner in this application. 07.07.2025 Index: Yes/ No Speaking order / Non speaking order Maya

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Maya Dated : 07.07.2025