Madras High CourtCRL OP/14108/2020dismissed

Saravanan v. State Rep. By

2020-09-10Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.14108 of 2020 Saravanan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Chinnaselam Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

(Crime No.1032/2020).

... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.1032/2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Muhammed Aseef For Respondent : Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 312, 419, 420 of IPc and r/w. Section 15(3) of Indian Medical Council Act, in Crime No.1032 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, the de facto complainant Viz., Dr.Pankajam, Government Medical Officer on information has conducted the regular check up and found that the petitioner along with the other accused was running the illegal abortion clinic by using unregistered equipments for conducting scan on the pregnant women. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against him. He further submitted that the other https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

accused have been arrested and thereafter released on bail. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner along with other accused was found to run the illegal abortion clinic and thereby they have conducted several abortions for 4-5 month pregnant ladies by using unregistered equipments in violation of law endangering lives of several women. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court in not to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 10/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, KALLAKURICHI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNASALEM POLICE STATION, KALLAKURICHI DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. G.MOHAMMED ASEEF Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.14108/2020 Date :10/09/2020 MK:22/09/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/