← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14139/2023dismissed

P.N.Vinoth v. Assistant Commissioner Of Police

2023-05-04Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.05.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.IlANTHIRAIYAN Dr.P.N.Vinoth ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, St.Thomas Mount Range, Chennai - 600 016.

2.The Inspector of Police, S-4, Nandampakkam Police Station, Chennai - 600 069.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner's property at Survey No.266/1A2, 290, 291, 293, 296, 298, 299, 301, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 309, 310 and 319, Manapakkam Village, Porur Taluk, Chennai, in constructing and erecting the compound wall by considering the representation dated 20.04.2023 and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit to pass and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.Swarnam J.Rajagopalan For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The Writ Petition has been filed for directing the respondents to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner's property at Survey No.266/1A2, 290, 291, 293, 296, 298, 299, 301, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 309, 310 and 319, Manapakkam Village, Porur Taluk, Chennai, in constructing and erecting the compound wall by considering the representation dated 20.04.2023.

2. The learned counsel for petitioner submitted that, vide Settlement Deeds in Document No.1185/2021, 1186/2021 and 1188/2021, petitioner's father settled the above stated properties in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, petitioner was in absolute possession and enjoyment of the property. On 18.04.2023, when the erection of compound wall work was going on in the petitioner's land, some rowdy elements and anti-social elements entered into his property and threatened the workers in dire consequences. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks police protection to the petitioner's property.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that, this case is civil in nature and the petitioner has to approach the appropriate authorities for seeking his relief.

4. Considering the submissions of the parties, it is seen that, petitioner apprehends threat from rowdy elements and anti-social elements in his property. The entire allegations are civil in nature. Therefore, the petitioner has to approach the appropriate authorities for seeking relief.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 04.05.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No gd To 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, St.Thomas Mount Range, Chennai - 600 016.

2.The Inspector of Police, S-4, Nandampakkam Police Station, Chennai - 600 069.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

G.K.IlANTHIRAIYAN, J.

gd 04.05.2023