Narayanasami v. Periyar Nagar Veetu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03..08..2016 C O R A M The Hon'ble Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R.MAHADEVAN Writ Appeal No.672 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 Narayanasami ... Appellant/8th respondent

Versus

1.Periyar Nagar Veetu Urimaiyalargal Podhu Nala Sangam Regd. In No.74/2003 dated 07.08.2003 rep. by its President A.R.Ramasamy having its Office at 151/0/16 Palladam Village, Palladam Taluk, Coimbatore District ... 1st Respondent/Writ petitioner 2.The Special Commissioner and Land Administration Coimmissioner, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

3.The District Collector, 4.The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

5.The Revenue Divisional Officer Kumaran Road, Tiruppur, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

6.The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk,

7.The Sub Registrar Palladam Taluk 8.Varadaraja Naidu Executive Officer, Arulmigu Angalamman Temple Palladam, ... Respondents 2 to 8/ Respondents 1 to 7 Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Section 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 22.12.2006 in WP.No.22858 of 2006, on the file of this Court.

Writ Petition filed U/A 226 of the Constitution of India praying to a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.11710/2004/E.2 dated 10.11.2004 confirming the order of the 4th respondent in Ref.No.2022/2002/A2 dated 22.1.2004 and quash the said order of the 3rd respondent directing 2nd 3rd 4th and 5th respondents to issue transfer of pattas to the names of members of petitioner association as per orders of Settlement Tasildar-I Gobichettypalayam dated 22.4.1969 in S.R.No.27/69 and order dated 31.10.1972 in CMA No.676/69 and Batch by Inams Tribunal Cum Principal Subordinate Judge Coimbatore from the names of their respective Vendors in respect-of-respective Sub-Divided extents in Main Survey No.334/1 Palladam Village, Palladam Taluk, Coimbatore District.

For Appellant :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan Special Government Pleader for R.2 to R.7 Mr.R.Jothinarayanan for R.1

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Honourable The Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the appellant states that he had given change of vakalat in the year 2007. However, no other counsel had entered appearance.

2. We find from the record that it is a case where the matter was remitted back for re-consideration in terms of the impugned order and no interim order has been granted. Thus, that may be the reason that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.

3. The writ appeal is thus dismissed for non-prosecution, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Special Commissioner and Land Administration, Coimmissioner, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

2.The District Collector, 3.The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kumaran Road, Tiruppur, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

5.The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk, 6.The Sub Registrar, Palladam Taluk, W.A. No.672 of 2007 scd[co] srg 24/08/2016