← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/12078/2021granted

Deena @ Sarin v. State Rep.By

2021-07-13Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.12078 of 2021

1. Deena @ Sarin

2. Dinesh

3. Iango @ Elangovan

4. Kumaran ... Petitioners Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Killiyanoor Police Station, Villupuram District, (Crime No.121 of 2021.

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, prayed to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.121 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sudhakar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl side)

ORDER

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324, 506(ii) and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.121 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant had taken lake in the auction and now fish are grown. Further, the petitioners had taken fish in lake without permission of the defacto complainant. Subsequently, compromise between them. Thereafter, the petitioners had taken fish from the lake and the same was questioned by the defacto complainant and taken to local people for panchayat, at that time, the petitioners had attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint was registered.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case pending as against the petitioners. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Considering the fact that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case pending against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vanur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) if the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

(d) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 13/07/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VANUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILLUPURAM [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KILIYANOOR POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1CC to M/S. K.SUDHAKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.7358 CRL OP.12078/2021 Date :13/07/2021 MK:22/07/2021