Selvaraji v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 17.09.2020 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.14103 of 2020 Selvaraji ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By Inspector of Police, Vadavanakkambadi Police Station, Vadavanakkambadi, Tiruvnnamalai District.

(Crime No.1347 of 2020) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail in Crime No.1347 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Vadavanakkambadi Police Station, Vadavanakkambadi, Tiruvnnamalai District.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jawahar For Respondent : Mr.T.Shunmugarajeswaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.08.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.1347 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that when the father of the defacto complainant was sitting near the temple constructed by the petitioner on 27.08.2020, the petitioner quarrelled with him and during the quarrel, the petitioner strangulated him with a rope, due to which, the father of the defacto complainant sustained injuries.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had constructed a temple and that there was a quarrel between the father of the defacto complainant and the petitioner with regard to the administration of the temple and that a false case has been given due to previous enmity. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that on 27.08.2020 there was a quarrel between the father of the defacto complainant and the petitioner, due to which, the petitioner strangulated the father of the defacto complainant with a rope. Fortunately, the victim escaped and he was treated as in-patient and now he has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that the petitioner is having one previous case under the Prohibition Act.

5.Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances and the submissions made by the learned counsels and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

(a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute his own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) before the Superintendent of the concerned prison, in which the petitioner has been confined; (b) Thereafter, the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, within a period of two weeks from the date of commencement of the Court's normal functioning, failing which the bail granted by this Court shall stand dismissed automatically; (c) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (d) the petitioner on his release from prison, shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

(e) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature;

(f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(g) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(h) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

(i) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 17/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VANDAVASI.

2 THE OFFICER INCHARGE SUB JAIL, VANDAVASI.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAVANAKKAMBADI POLICE STATION, VADAVANAKKAMBADI, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.B.JAWAHAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.14103/2020 Date :17/09/2020 cs 25/09/2020