← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14681/2021disposed of

S.B.G.Sanskrit Mission, B.Ed College v. National Council For Teacher Education

2021-07-20Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.7.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.14681 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.15581 of 2021 S.B.G.Sanskrit Mission B.Ed.College Rep by its Correspondent R. Senthamarai, Bazaar Street, Mutharasanallur, Tiruchirappalli District.

... Petitioner Vs.

National Council for Teacher Education Rep by its Region Director, Southern Regional Committee, G-7 Section -10(Near sector-10 Metro station), Dwaraka, New Delhi-110 075.

... Respondent Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and quash the impugned order passed by the respondent vide F.SRO/NCTE/ APSO4840/ B.Ed / TN/ 2021 / 124776 dated 10.3.2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kannan For Respondent : Mr.Thirunavukkarasu ******

ORDER

According to the counsel appearing for the petitioner, a show cause notice has been served to the petitioner on 7.9.2020 and the petitioner submitted an explanation to the respondent and no inspection conducted by the respondent before passing the impugned order withdrawing the recognition of B.Ed. Course granted to the petitioner. Therefore, counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to set aside the impugned order by considering his representation.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent denied the allegation made by the petitioner and stated that the petitioner College was given sufficient opportunities by the respondent to submit their explanation and the explanation submitted by the petitioner was not disputed. If the petitioner is aggrieved, they can file an appeal before the appellate authority.

3. According to the Standing counsel appearing for the respondent, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order, the petitioner has to prefer an appeal before the Appellate authority. In response to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that already an appeal has been preferred before the Appellate authority.

4. Taking note of the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is inclined to direct the Appellate authority to take final decision after providing opportunities to the petitioner as per the guidelines of the respondent and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above directions. No Costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vaan To The Region Director, National Council for Teacher Education, Southern Regional Committee, G-7 Section -10(Near sector-10 Metro station), Dwaraka, New Delhi-110 075.

W.P.No.14681 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.15581 of 2021 KV (CO) K.RK. (09.08.2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/