Ramasamy v. Gurusamy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.04.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN S.A.No.141 of 2011 1.

Ramasamy 2.

Palaniammal 3.

A.M.Raja 4.

N.Santhi ..Proposed Appellants 5.

M.Kulandasamy .. Appellants/2nd Defendant Cause title accepted vide order of the Court dated 28.01.2011 made in MP.No.1 of 2010 in SA.SR.92252 of 2010 Vs.

1.

Gurusamy 2.

M.Sengottaiyan 3.

Murugan 4.

C.Perumal Gounder 5.

Thiagarajan ... Respondents/Plaintiff/ Defendants 3-6 Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2004 passed in A.S.No.55 of 2003 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani, Erode District reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.07.2001 passed in O.S.No.191 of 1991 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Bhavani.

For Appellant :

Mr.V.Rajesh For R1 :

Not ready in notice For R2 to R5 :

Given up

J U D G M E N T

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he has no instructions from the appellants. It is seen that the earlier order dated 09.03.2017 passed by this Court has also not been complied with. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

In view of the above, recording the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that he has no instructions from the appellants to prosecute the appeal, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar aeb To:

1.

The Sub Court, Bhavani, Erode District.

2.

The Principal District Munsif Court, Bhavani. 3.

The V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.141 of 2011 SKV(CO) RS(05/05/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/