M.Murugesan v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY M.Murugesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District collector, Salem.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur, Salem District.

3. TheAssistant Commissioner, (Kalal) Salem, Salem District.

4. The Tahsildar, Taluk office, Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem.

5. The Village Administrative Officer, Tharapuram / Kanjanaickanpatti village, Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem District.

6. Radhakrishnan

7. Venkatesh ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents to conduct an enquiry and pass orders U/s. 133 to 143 Cr.P.C. in order to remove the unlawful obstructions in public pathway in S. No. 331 / 20B to an extent of 10 cents at

Kanjanaickenpatti Village, Kadayampatti Taluk by considering the petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2022 and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s):

No appearance For Respondent(s):

Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader for R1 to R5 Mr.C.R.Malarvanan for R6 & R7

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.07.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, today, the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even though sufficient opportunity was provided, none appeared for the petitioners.

2.

Therefore, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for 'nonprosecution'. No order as to costs. 13-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vm

To

1. The District collector, Salem.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur, Salem District.

3. TheAssistant Commissioner, (Kalal) Salem, Salem District.

4. The Tahsildar, Taluk office, Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem.

5. The Village Administrative Officer, Tharapuram / Kanjanaickanpatti village, Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem District.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

vm 13-03-2026