P.Ganesan v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.No.20295 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.24424 of 2004 P.Ganesan .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner, Ambattur Muncipality, Ambattur, Chennai-53.

2. V.Samburnam .. Respondents Prayer: Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeing to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to recall the work order issued by the second respondent in respect of the work items specified in the schedule to the petition.

For Petitioners : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Arunmozhi for R1

O R D E R

The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the first respondent to recall the work order issued by the second respondent in respect of the work items specified in the schedule to the petition.

2. This writ petition is filed in the year 2004. Since the matter is pending for more than 14 years, the petitioner may got the relief as prayed for within a specified period from the date of filing of the petition. Hence, there is nothing survives in this writ petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vum To The Commissioner, Ambattur Muncipality, Ambattur, Chennai-53.

+1cc to Mr.R.ARUNMOZHI, Advocate, S.R.No. 51135 W.P.No.20295 of 2004 & W.P.M.P.No.24424 of 2004 AD(CO) TR(20/08/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/