Samrat v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirteenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13486 of 2022 SAMRAT [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HUDCO POLICE STATION, HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.188 OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.R.SANKARASUBBU Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.DAMODARAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 25(I)(a) of Arms Act, in Crime.No.188 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.It is the case of the prosecution that totally, there are seven accused in this case and the petitioner is arrayed as A7. On 27.05.2022, the defacto complainant, who is Sub-Inspector of Police received an information that five persons assembled with deadly weapons and were planning to commit an offence. In the said circumstances, the present criminal case has been registered against the petitioner. Now apprehending arrest, the present petition has been filed by the petitioner. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the coaccused A6 was granted anticipatory bail in Crl.OP.No.12951 of 2022 dated 01.06.2022. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner had conspired with another accused to commit an offence and based on apprehension of commission of offence, the present case has been registered against the petitioner. He further submits that four cases are pending against the petitioner and the two cases are similar in nature. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances and also the fact that the petitioner has four previous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 13/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HUDCO POLICE STATION, HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.R.SANKARASUBBU Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.13486/2022 Date :13/06/2022 RVR 22/06/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/