G.Yuvaraj v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.08.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.26280 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 G.Yuvaraj ..

Petitioner Vs.

The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai-1.

..

Respondent Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent relating to Pro.Na.Ka.No.E2/4241/2015 dated 04.05.2015 to quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the respondent to permit the petitioner to put up a bunk shop in the office campus of any one of the Departments of the Government of Tamil Nadu on such terms and conditions as the Government may impose. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Punniyakotti For Respondent : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, Government Advocate

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent relating to Pro.Na.Ka.No.E2/4241/2015 dated 04.05.2015 and to quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to put up a bunk shop in the office campus of any one of the Departments of the Government of Tamil Nadu on such terms and conditions as the Government may impose.

2.

Heard Mr.G.Punniyakotti, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 3.

The petitioner has given a representation dated 25.10.2014 to permit him to run a Xerox Shop in K.K.Nagar Taulk https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Office. Pursuant to the representation dated 25.10.2014, the District Collector has given an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and after considering the case of the petitioner, rejected the representation stating that the private parties are not permitted to run any Tea Shop or Xerox Shop inside the Taluk Office Complex.

4.

When it is the stand of the respondent that the third parties are not permitted to run any Tea Shop or Xerox Shop inside the Taluk Office Complex, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the respondent. In these circumstances, the Writ Petition is devoid of merits and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsi To The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai-1.

+1cc to Mr.G.Punniyakotti, Advocate, S.R.No.57846 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.57894 W.P.No.26280 of 2015 PVS(CO) GN(31/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/