Vijay @ Poi Vijay v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.14291 of 2020 Vijay @ Poi Vijay ... Petitioner Vs.
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police M-5, Ennore Police Station Chennai (Crime No.1096 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.1096 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Illiyas For Respondent : Mr.T.Shunmugarajeswaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to the Judicial Custody on 01.06.2020, for the offences punishable under Section 341, 294(b), 307, 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.1096 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant one Sanjay is that on 31.05.2020, due to previous enmity and wordy quarrel, the petitioner along with another accused abused the defacto complainant and assaulted him with knife over the head and that the victim was discharged only after three days. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 01.06.2020.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would vehemently oppose stating that the petitioner is a notorious element and he has got eight previous cases of similar nature against him as follows:
1. Cr.No.1565/2017, M5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 307 IPC.
2. Cr.No.1568/2018, M5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 336, 427, 392, 397, 506(ii) IPC.
3. Cr.No.879/2018, M5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 336, 427, 392, 392, 506 (ii) IPC.
4. Cr.No.233/2018, M5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 397, 506 (ii) IPC.
5. Cr.No.596/2018, M5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 336, 427, 392, 397, 506 (ii) IPC.
6. Cr.No.905/2018, M5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 336, 427, 392, 397, 506 (ii) IPC.
7. Cr.No.1041/2018, M5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC r/w 4 of TNPHW Act.
8. Cr.No.451/2019, H5 Police Station, u/s.341, 294(b), 323, 307, 506 (ii) IPC.
5.Taking into consideration of the submissions so made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a notorious element and he has got eight previous cases to his credit and also considering the fact that the investigation is still in progress, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6.This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed accordingly.
-sd/- 14/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M-5 ENNORE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.
CC to M/S.M.ILLIYAS Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.14291/2020 Date :14/09/2020 MK:23/09/2020