Mr.K.Nagappan v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 19.10.2022 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI Mr.K.Nagappan

...Petitioner in W.P.No.35178 of 2016

Mr.M.Loganathan

...Petitioner in W.P.No.35179 of 2016

Versus

1.The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai.

2.The Tahsildar, Mylapore/Triplicane Taluk Office, Chennai - 600 028.

3.The Tahsildar, Velacherry Taluk Office, Velacherry, Chennai - 600 042.

4.The Assistant Director, Land Survey Record Department, Chennai - 600 001.

...Respondents in both W.Ps

1/4

Prayer in W.P.No.35178 of 2016:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to issue a Patta in favour of the petitioner pertaining to No.A/21, Kalingundram Ist Street, Kalikundram, Taramani, Chennai - 600 113, comprised in town survey No.4/1, Old Survey No.80/part, Kalikundram Village, Mylapore-Triplicane Taluk measuring an extent of 1,200 sq.ft. based on the recommendation order issued by the fourth respondent in proceedings No.Na.Ka.E1.No.2149/2009 dated 22.03.2010.

Prayer in W.P.No.35179 of 2016:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to issue a Patta in favour of the petitioner pertaining to No.3/4, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Kalikundram, Taramani, Chennai - 600 113, comprised in town survey No.4/1, Old Survey No.80/part, Kalikundram Village, MylaporeTriplicane Taluk measuring an extent of 2,400 sq.ft. based on the recommendation order issued by the fourth respondent in proceedings No.Na.Ka.E1.No.2149/2009 dated 22.03.2010.

For Petitioner in both W.Ps :

No Appearance For Respondents in both W.Ps :

Mr.U.Bharanidharan, Additional Govt. Pleader 2/4

COMMON ORDER When these writ petitions were taken up for consideration on 17.10.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner in both petitions. Hence, these petitions were directed to be listed under the caption, "For Dismissal" on 19.10.2021 i.e., today.

2. Accordingly, today, these petitions are listed under the caption, "For Dismissal". However, even today, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through his learned counsel. This shows that the petitioner in both writ petitions are not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 19.10.2022 mrr Index : Yes/No 3/4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

mrr Copy to 1.The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai.

2.The Tahsildar, Mylapore/Triplicane Taluk Office, Chennai - 600 028.

3.The Tahsildar, Velacherry Taluk Office, Velacherry, Chennai - 600 042.

4.The Assistant Director, Land Survey Record Department, Chennai - 600 001.

19.10.2022 4/4