C.N.Mani v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.No.856 of 2013 C.N.Mani ..Petitioner /vs/ 1.The District Collector, District Collector Officer, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Thasildhar, Thasildhar Office, Arni, Tiruvannamalai District.

..Respondents Prayer : - Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 10.11.2012 and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to run the canteen.

For Petitioner :No Appearance For Respondents :Mr.V.S.Ramesh, Addl.Govt.Pleader ------

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 08.11.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal" on 28.11.2016. Even today, (i.e. 28.11.2016), there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the learned counsel on record. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

ari Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The District Collector, District Collector Officer, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Thasildhar, Thasildhar Office, Arni, Tiruvannamalai District.

+ 1 cc to The Govt. Pleader, Sr 70095 KR/28/12 W.P.No.856 of 2013 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/