Mariammal v. Rajeshwari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.03.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN S.A. 27 of 2016 and C.M.P. 711 of 2016 R.Mariammal ... Appellant/Defendant Vs.

R. Rajeshwari ... Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer :- This Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and decree dated 21.10.2011 in A.S.No.10 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Harur confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.11.2009 in O.S.No.41 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Harur. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.Parmasivadoss

JUDGMENT

When the matter came up for hearing yesterday (20.03.2019), the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that he has no instructions from the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the matter has already settled between the parties.

In the above circumstances, the matter was listed by printing the name of the appellant. But, today, when the matter was called, the appellant called absent. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpp https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.Principal Subordinate Judge, Harur.

2. The District Munsif,, Harur

3. The Section Officer, VR Section High Court, Madras (2 copies) S.A. 27 of 2016 and C.M.P. 711 of 2016 BR(CO) GMY(25/04/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/