Lakshmi Loganathan v. Mahindra And Mahindra Financial Services Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 15.11.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL Civil Revision Petition No. 1660 of 2023 and Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 10842 of 2023 --- Lakshmi Loganathan

...Petitioner

versus Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory Mr.R. Dinesh.

Registered office at:

Gateway Building Apollo Bunder, Mumbai-400 001.

...Respondent

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Order dated September 27, 2022 made in EP.No.275 of in CNR.No.TNCH01-024319-2020 in ARB.(M&M).No.RC/ARB/2018/5/2018 on the file of XXVI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondent :

Mr.N.Ranjith ---- 1/4

ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 06.11.2024 this Court observed as follows:- "No representation for the revision petitioner. 2.Mr.Ranjith, learned counsel representing Mr.S.Namasivayam, learned counsel on record for the respondent is present.

3.With a view to give one more opportunity to the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is adjourned to 08.11.2024."

2.

Again, when the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 08.11.2024 this Court observed as follows:- "There is no representation for the revision petitioner. 2.However, with a view to give one more opportunity to the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is adjourned to 13.11.2024.

3.List the matter on 13.11.2024. It is made clear that no further adjournment will be given on that day." 3.

Subsequently, when the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 13.11.2024 this Court observed as follows:- "No representation for the revision petitioner. 2.Mr.N.Ranjith, learned counsel for the respondent is present.

3.Post the matter on 15.11.2024 under the cause list caption "for dismissal"."

2/4

4.

Today also, there is no representation for the revision petitioner. 5.

Mr.N.Ranjith, learned counsel for the respondent is present. 6.

Despite sufficient opportunities given to the revision petitioner, the revision petitioner has not proceeded with the Civil Revision Petition. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 15.11.2024 MSM 3/4

R. SAKTHIVEL, J MSM Civil Revision Petition No. 1660 of 2023 15.11.2024 4/4