Madras High CourtCRL OP/12337/2021dismissed

Mani v. State By

2021-07-16Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of July Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.12337 of 2021 MANI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIPCOT POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.702/2021) For Petitioner : M/S M.JAYACHANDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 364(A) of IPC, in Crime No.702 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the the husband of the defacto complainant petitioner is employed under the petitioner for some time and there was some money dispute between them. Thereafter, with the help of other accused, they abducted the husband defacto complainant and demanded money. Since, he refused to give, the petitioner have taken the ATM Card of the defacto complainant and purchased gold jewels. Hence, the complaint was registered. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the husband of the defacto complainant petitioner is employed under the petitioner for some time and there was some money dispute between them. Thereafter, with the help of other accused, the petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

abducted the husband defacto complainant and demanded money. Since, he refused to give, they have taken the ATM Card of the defacto complainant and purchased gold jewels. He further submits that there are two previous cases pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts of the case and the nature of offence committed by the petitioner and there are two previous cases pending the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 16/07/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIPCOT POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S M.JAYACHANDRAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.12337/2021 Date :16/07/2021 INBA 26/07/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/