Suseela, v. Ravi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 21.07.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(NPD).No.1100 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.6076 of 2016 Suseela ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Ravi rep by his Power Agent father P.S.Arumugam 2.Dhavamani 3.Kumar 4.Kala 5.Santhi 6.Veeramani ... Respondents Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 04.12.2015 made in I.A.No.98 of 2012 in O.S.No.64 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Nagapattinam.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Muruga Bharathi - no appearance
O R D E R
Consistently, there is no representation for the petitioner. When the matter was listed for hearing on 30.06.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was adjourned by two weeks. Again, when
M.DURAISWAMY,J.
va the matter was listed on 14.07.2016, there was no representation. Hence, the matter was adjourned to today (i.e) 21.07.2016 under the caption for dismissal. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : No 21.07.2016 Internet : Yes va To The Subordinate Court, Nagapattinam.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1100 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.6076 of 2016