Madras High CourtWP/4615/2013disposed of

The National Textile Workers v. The Addl. Central Provident

2015-03-04Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.03.2015 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.4615 of 2013 The National Textile Workers Union, rep.by its Secretary Mr.Selvaraj ..

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, (Tamil Nadu & Kerala) No.37, Royapettah High Road, Opposite Swagat Hotel, Chennai-600 014 2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Bhavaishya Nidhi Bhavan, P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore 3.The Management of Selvarani Cotton Mills Pvt.Ltd., No.20.21, Rajashanthi Apartment, Natham Road, Dindigul ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent and second respondent to take appropriate action to disburse the Employees Provident Fund benefits to the petitioner union members. For Petitioner ..

Mr.S.Saravanan For Respondents .. Mr.K.Ramu for R1 and R2 No appearance for R3

ORDER

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the first and second respondents to take appropriate action to disburse the Employees Provident Fund benefits to the members of their Union.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. For disbursement of the Employees' Provident Fund benefit to the members of the petitioner Union, the petitioner Union gave a representation dated 6.12.2012 to respondents 1 and 2, which was also duly acknowledged by them.

3.Mr.K.Ramu, the learned counsel takes notice for respondents 1 and 2 and submitted that the second respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and dispose of the same, within a stipulated time.

4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into account the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 6.12.2012 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observation. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msk To 1.The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, (Tamil Nadu & Kerala) No.37, Royapettah High Road, Opposite Swagat Hotel, Chennai-600 014 2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Bhavaishya Nidhi Bhavan, P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore + 1 cc to Mr.S.Saravanan, Advocate SR.11938 + 1 cc to Mr.K. Ramu, Advocate SR.11958 W.P.No.4615 of 2013 RSY(CO) EU 19.03.15 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/