Madras High CourtCRL OP/13654/2021dismissed

Murugan v. The State Rep By

2021-08-05Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13654 of 2021 MURUGAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT CR NO. 102/2021 For Petitioner : M/S.S.PANNEER SELVAM Advocate For Respondent : M/S. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 399 of IPC in Crime No.102 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were in possession of deadly weapons and planned to commit dacoity and caught red-handed by the respondent police. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the petitioner along with other accused were in possession of deadly weapons and planned to commit dacoity. He further submits https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

that the petitioner has two previous cases to his credit and this is the petitioner's second bail application and the previous application was dismissed by this Court on 01.07.2021 in Crl.OP.No.11288 of 2021. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the previous cases facts and circumstances of the case and there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 05/08/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.S.PANNEER SELVAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.13654/2021 Date :05/08/2021 APN 16/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/