← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/13616/2022granted

Kowsalya v. State Rep By Its

2022-06-14Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourteenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13616 of 2022 1 KOWSALYA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 KAMALA 3 KARTHI @ SIVA 4 ANNAPOORANI 5 MURUGESAN 6 SEKAR Vs STATE REP BY ITS [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.149/2022.

For Petitioner : M/S.M.SENTHIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.DAMODARAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 448, 323 & 506(1) of IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No. 149 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have entered the house of the defacto complainant and had misbehaved, attacked the victim. Hence, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint under the alleged aforesaid sections before the respondent police and hence, the present complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners are an innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have attacked the defacto complainant and had caused injuries. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital on 27.05.2022. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the victim discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Mettur, Salem District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner Nos. 3, 5 & 6 shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner Nos.1, 2 & 4 shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 14/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, METTUR, SALEM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.M.SENTHIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.9156 CRL OP.13616/2022 Date :14/06/2022 RVR 20/06/2022