Tamillarasan v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.07.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.12508 of 2021 Tamilarasan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State rep. by ... Respondent The Sub Inspector of Police, T.Palur Police Station, Ariyalur District.

(Crime No.274 of 2021) Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.274 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap for P.P.

ORDER

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 379 of I.P.C. r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957 in Cr.No.274 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was involved in illegal transportation of 150 Kgs. of sand in sand bags. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, he would further submit that the petitioner, without prejudice to his rights, is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the Mineral Foundation Trust. 4.The learned Government Advocate submitted that the vehicle involved was seized by the respondent police. He further submitted that if the person is caught with illegal sand in the mining area, he

has to be directed to deposit the conditional amount to the credit of Crime number. However, in view of formation of District Mineral Foundation Trust in each District, the amount may be deposited to the credit of the said Trust for rehabilitation in the areas affected by illegal sand mining.

5.In view of the rehabilitation undertaken by the State Government under the Tamil Nadu District Mineral Foundation Rules, 2017, and in order to curb the illegal sand mining activities and also considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner shall be directed to make a non refundable deposit of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of the concerned District Mineral Foundation Trust, without prejudice to his rights and contentions. The amount so deposited shall be utilised by the Trust for rehabilitation works.

6.It is made clear that the deposit of the amount by the petitioner to the Trust would not amount to admission of guilt. The trial Court shall deal with the case independently on merits without reference to the amount deposited at the stage of anticipatory bail. 7.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

8.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Principal District Cum Sessions Judge, Ariyalur District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)if the petitioner failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b)the petitioner shall make a non refundable deposit of Rs.

(c)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (d)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;

(e)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(f)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(g)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (h)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 20/07/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT CUM SESSIONS JUDGE, ARIYALUR DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARIYALUR DISTRICT [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.PALUR POLICE STATION, ARIYALUR DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE CHAIRMAN/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, ARIYALUR.

+1CC to M/S G.PUGAZHENTHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.7577 CRL OP.12508/2021 Date :20/07/2021 CSK 27/07/2021