Velmurugan v. The State Rep.By Its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.12527 of 2021
1. Velmurugan
2. Pragash ... Petitioners Vs.
The State Represented by :- Inspector of Police, Nangavalli Police Station, Salem District.
(Crime No.249 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.249 of 2021 pending on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioners: Mr.M.Senthilkumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl side)
O R D E R
The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 341, 342, 355, 352 and 506(ii) of IPC in Cr.No.249 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners along with other accused persons attacked the defacto complainant with hand and stick and caused injuries. Thereby, the Law Enforcing Agency registered a case against the petitioners. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not been committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate submits that the victim has been treated as out-patient in the hospital.
5. Considering the fact that the victim sustained only simple injuries and he has taken treatment as an out-patient, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Mettur, Salem, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. For a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 20/07/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I,METTUR, SALEM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S. M.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.12527/2021 Date :20/07/2021 RVR 29/07/2021