← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/13833/2026allowed

Innoviti Technologies Private Limited v. Rajeev Manchanda

2026-06-08Honourable Mr.Justice K.Kumaresh Babu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in CMA(PT) SR No. 69804 OF 2025 Innoviti Technologies Private Limited Tower C, 2nd Floor, Diamond District, Old Airport Road, Kodihalli, Bangalore 560008, Karnataka Through its Authorized Representative Ms.Ashita Virmani ..Applicant(s) Vs

1. Rajeev Manchanda A citizen of India of E-148 East of Kailash, New Delhi 110065.

2. Pranay Sinha A Citizen of India of E-6, 2nd Floor, Geetanjali Enclave, New Delhi 110017.

3. The Assistant Controller of Patents And Designs Patents Office IPR Building, SIDCO Plot, GST Road, Guindy Chennai 32.

..Respondent(s) Prayer: This application is filed to allow the counsel for the applicant/appellant to carry out the substituted service on the respondent No.1 by way of publication/advertisement in any English Newspaper or Vernacular (Hindi) Newspaper or both which are circulated in and around New Delhi.

For Appellant(s) :

Mr.K.Muthu Selvam For Respondent(s) :

Mr.J.Madhanagopal Rao for R3 No appearance for R1 and R2

ORDER

This petition is filed to allow the counsel for the applicant/appellant to carry out the substituted service on the respondent No.1 by way of publication/advertisement in any English Newspaper or Vernacular (Hindi) Newspaper or both which are circulated in and around New Delhi.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the application

3. Since the learned counsel who represented the respondents 1 and 2 in the opposition had in the notice of opposition dated 28.11.2025 only shown the address that had been shown in the petition to be their address & the notice which had been attempted to be served had been returned unserved with an endorsement "No Such Person".

Despite the efforts of the applicant/appellant, it was unable to serve on the first respondent. Therefore, the applicant had taken up the present application requesting for substituted service on the first respondent.

4. The Court being satisfied with the reasons attributed finds no

impediment in ordering the application for substitute of service.

5. Accordingly, this petition is ordered as prayed for.

6. Registry is directed to post the main case in the usual course along with C.M.P.No.20301 of 2025.

08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order rap To

1. Rajeev Manchanda A citizen of India of E-148 East of Kailash, New Delhi 110065.

2.

3. Pranay Sinha A Citizen of India of E-6, 2nd Floor, Geetanjali Enclave, New Delhi 110017.

4. The Assistant Controller of Patents And Designs Patents Office IPR Building, SIDCO Plot, GST Road, Guindy Chennai 32.

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

rap in CMA(PT) SR No. 69804 of 2025 08-06-2026