Kulandhaivel v. State
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.14410 of 2020 Kulandhaivel ... Petitioner vs.
State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Anchetty Police Station, Krishnagiri District.
Crime No.201/2020.
... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to grant Anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No.201 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 332, 506 (ii) and 307 of IPC in Crime No.201 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, based on the information, on 06.08.2020 at about 5.45 p.m., while the forest watcher was patrolling, the accused persons had illegally entered into the forest and cut the trees and therefore, the defacto complainant questioned them. The petitioner attacked the de-facto complainant, as a result of which, the defacto complainant sustained cut injuries at his right hand. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against him. He would further submit that A1 was arrested and granted bail in Crl.O.P.No.13585 of 2020 dated 08.09.2020. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that there are no previous cases pending as against the petitioner. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel appearing on either side and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions;
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days after lifting of lock down or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
8. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.
-sd/- 16/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DEKANIKOTTAI.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANCHETTY POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.
CC to M/S.M.P.SARAVANAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.14410/2020 Date :16/09/2020 cs 24/09/2020