Kamanayakar v. The Special Commissioner &

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.09.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.40267 of 2002 and W.P.M.P.No.59785 of 2002 Kamanayakar ... Petitioner Vs.

The Special Commissioner & Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

.. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of a Writ of Certiaorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent made in D.Dis.R.A.V.(5)/68260/2002, dated 30.09.2002, quash the same, and consequently direct the respondent herein to direct the respondent herein to condone the delay in filing the appeal and take the appeal on its file and dispose of the same on merits.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi,AGP

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for restoration, if required. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

-Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

usk To The Special Commissioner & Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

+1 cc to Mr.N.Nithianandam,Advocate(sr.53258) W.P.No.40267 of 2002 NM(co) cp 08/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/