← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/20660/2013dismissed

Sailesh v. S.R.Jeevraj

2015-09-16Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.09.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.OP Nos.20660 to 20663 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 in Crl.O.P.No.20661 of 2013 Sailesh T.Bhansali .. Petitioner in allCrl.O.Ps Vs 1.S.R.Jeevraj 2.Liddellsdale Estate Ossington Division,Naduvattam Post, Niligiris TamilNadu 3.Lalu T.Bhansali 4.Gautam Mukherjee .. Respondents in all Crl.O.Ps.

Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.20660 of 2013:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 21.11.2012 passed in Crl.M.P.No.9995/2012 in C.C.No.156/1997, Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur.

Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.20661 of 2013:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.156/1997, Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur. Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.20662 of 2013:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 21.11.2012 passed in Crl.M.P.No.9824/2012 in C.C.No.156/1997, Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur.

Prayer in Crl.OP.NO.20663 of 2013: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to set aside the order dated 31/10/2012 passed in Crl.MP.No.9640/2012 in C.C.No.156/1997, Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur.

For Petitioner in all Crl.O.Ps :Mr.P.Sukumar For Respondents in all Crl.O.Ps :Mr.T.R.Sundaram https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

COMMON ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2.These petitions have been filed by the petitioner/accused challenging the prosecution in C.C.No.156/1997 lodged against the petitioner by the respondents herein under the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952. It appears that the trial Court had convicted the petitioner in C.C.No.156/1997 as early as on 21.11.2012. This fact has not been revealed by the petitioner in these quash petitions filed before this Court.

3.Since, the petitioner has already been convicted much earlier to the very filing of the quash petitions, nothing survives in these petitions. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed as no further order is necessary. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CSIII) dt:29/09/2015 True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+4 ccs to M/S.T.R.Sundaram, Advocate sr.51357 to 51359 & 51366 Crl.OP Nos.20660 to 20663 of 2013 aa30/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/