S.Navy Kumar v. V.S.Harini

Crl.M.P. No. 7700 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.25438 of 2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the affidavit of service. It is seen that notice has been served on both the respondents, but, there is no representation for the respondents.

2.Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above miscellaneous petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for.

25.07.2022 sli Note to Office:

Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise in order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis