Susheela Kawar v. M.Pettu Lakshmi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01-07-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CMP No. 15139 of 2026 in CRP SR No.58811 of 2026

1. Susheela Kawar W/o. Vijaychand Samdaria, Flat No.7172, TVH Lumbini Square Apartments, No.127A, Bricklin Road, Purasaiwakkam, Chennai 600 007.

Appellant(s) Vs

1. M.Pettu Lakshmi W/o. Mohan, No.12/116, Arulmurugan Nagar, Vitchur Road, Manali New Town, Chennai 600 103.

Respondent(s) For Appellant(s):

M.Meenarukmani For Respondent:

ORDER

Though there is a delay of 924 days in filing the revision, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the fact that the parties have settled the matter even before the trial Court and the issue pertains only to refund of court fee. The respondent has already consented for refund of the entire court fee. Hence, I am inclined to dispense with notice in the condone delay application and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.B.BALAJI.,J sr satisfied with the reasons assigned by the petitioner in not preferring the revision in time. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and the delay is condoned.

2. Registry is directed to number the revision if it is otherwise in order and post the revision in the regular course.

01.07.2026 sr CMP No. 15139 of 2026 in CRP SR No.58811 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis