Madras High CourtWP/17136/2017disposed of

K.Pakkir, S/O.Kasim Sahib v. The Tahsildar,

2017-07-06Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.07.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.17136 of 2017 K.Pakkir ... Petitioner Vs.

The Tahsildar, Cheiyur Taluk, Cheyyur, Kancheepuram District.

... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to issue Patta after Surveying the Petitioner's property being the vacant land property comprised in Punjai Old S.No.68/2B, (as per patta S.No.2B3A1) of an extent of 10 Cents, situated at Panaiyur Village, Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.02.2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ramalingam For Respondents : Mr.Era Premnath Government Advocate

O R D E R

Mr.Era Premnath, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to issue Patta after Surveying his property being the vacant land comprised in Punjai Old S.No.68/2B, (as per patta S.No.2B3A1) measuring an extent of 10 Cents, situated at Panaiyur Village, Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, by considering his representation dated 06.02.2017.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation dated 06.02.2017, the respondent has not been issued patta so far.

4. Mr.Era Premnath, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

parties.

5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.02.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar mm/rg To The Tahsildar,Cheiyur Taluk,Cheyyur, Kancheepuram District.

+1 CC to Mr.A. Ramalingam, Advocate sr 46931 +1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 47711 W.P.No.17136 of 2017 NM(CO) sp(19/07/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/