← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/1320/2016dismissed as infructuous

D. Rangaraj, v. M. Palanisamy,

2016-04-27Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:27.04.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA CRP (NPD) Nos.1320 and 1321 of 2016 and C.M.P.Nos.7405 and 7406 of 2016 D.Rangaraj ....

Petitioner in both CRP's .Vs.

1.M.Palanisamy 2.Gowri Palanisamy 3.Dharani 4.M.Vadivelu 5.Parvathi ....

Respondents in both CRP's Prayer in CRP (NPD) No.1320 of 2016: Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and decretal order dated 17.02.2016 made in R.C.A.No.22 of 2014 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge), Erode confirming the Fair and Decretal order dated 03.04.2013 made in I.A.No.54 of 2012 in R.C.O.P.No.15 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Erode.

Prayer in CRP (NPD) No.1321 of 2016: Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and decretal order dated 17.02.2016 made in R.C.A.No.23 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode confirming the Fair and Decretal order

dated S.VIMALA, J arr/mrp 03.04.2013 made in I.A.No.54 of 2012 in R.C.O.P.No.15 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Erode. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Munusamy For Respondents : Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan C O M M O N O R D E R Today, when these matters are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in these Civil Revision Petitions has become infructuous. He has made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 27.04.2016 arr/mrp To The Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode CRP (NPD) Nos.1320 and 1321 of 2016