P. Venkataramani v. Mrs. Maladevi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(P.D.) No.1325 of 2016 P.Venkataramani : Petitioner versus Maladevi : Respondent PRAYER: Revision filed against the order dated 27.1.2016, in I.A.No.2285 of 2014 in G.W.O.P.No.780 of 2011 on the file of III Additional Family Court, Chennai.

For petitioner :

Mr.A.P.Srinivas For respondent : Mr.Babitha Sunil

O R D E R

The interlocutory order passed by the learned III Additional Family Judge, Chennai, granting visitation rights to the respondent is under challenge in this civil revision petition.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not against grant of visitation rights. He is aggrieved by the direction to bring the child to Child Care Centre twice in a month. The learned counsel therefore seeks modification of the order passed by the learned trial Judge to exercise the visiting right once in a month.

K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.

(tar)

3. The learned counsel for the respondent while justifying the impugned order submitted that in spite of a direction being given by the learned trial Judge way back on 27 January 2016, the petitioner has not cared to show the child to the respondent, so to as to enable her to exercise the visitation right.

4. The learned trial Judge passed an interlocutory order taking into consideration the background facts. There is no question of modifying the said order by exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner should approach the learned trial Judge if he is otherwise aggrieved by the order granting visitation rights. I am therefore of the view that there is absolutely no merits in the civil revision petition.

5. In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.7417 of 2016 is also dismissed. 03.11.2016 tar To The III Additional Family Court, Chennai C.R.P.(P.D.) No.1325 of 2016

http://www.judis.nic.in