← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6944/2008dismissed

M. Natarajan v. The Chennai City

2018-02-07Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM WP.No.6944 of 2008 M.Natarajan

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Commissioner, The Chennai City Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Chennai.

[R1 impleaded as per the order of this Court, dated 20.06.2012 in W.P.No.6944 of 2008] 2.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

3.Padi Vattara Nadar Sangam, No.17, 1st Street, Korattur, Padi, Chennai - 600 050.

...Respondents

[R3 impleaded as per the order of this Court, dated 20.06.2012, in M.P.No.2 of 2008 in W.P.No.6944 of 2008] PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the the 1st respondent herein to enforce the direction given by the Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Cehnnai - 600 008, the 2nd respondent herein in his proceedings bearing No.G 15325 of 2007 dated 10.09.2007, in directing the 1st respondent to inspect and take appropriate action against such construction put up at No.17, 1st Floor, Kannagi Nagar, Korattur, Padi, Ambathur Taluk, Chennai - 600 080. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.Karthikaa Ashok (for R1) Mr.N.Sampath (for R2) Mr.M.L.Ramesh (for R3) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to enforce the direction given by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings bearing No.G 15325 of 2007 dated 10.09.2007 .

2. The learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that pursuant to the order of the 2nd respondent, dated 10.09.2007, the 1st respondent had issued a notice to the 3rd respondent for production of approved plan and in view of the non production of the said plan, the 1st respondent had issued a lock and seal notice, dated 14.12.2016. The learned counsel further submitted that the 1st respondent has taken appropriate action as sought for in this writ petition.

3. In the light of the above fact, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar pvs To 1.The Commissioner, The Chennai City Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Chennai.

2.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

+1 CC to Mr.M.L. Ramesh, advocate sr 9628.

+1 CC to Mr.N. Sampath, Advocate sr 9250.

WP.No.6944 of 2008 SP(21/02/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/