Seenuvasan, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.01.2021 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.14543 of 2018 Seenuvasan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Kallakurichi.

3.Santhanam

...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2016 consequently, direct the 1st respondent to take necessary action to cancel the certificate issued by Village Administrative Officer dated 02.09.2015.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Parameshwaran Government Advocate

O R D E R

The matter is listed under the caption for dismissal today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last hearing date i.e., on 07.01.2021, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS III ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar nl 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Kallakurichi.

W.P.No.14543 of 2018 PVS(CO) NRA(05/02/2021) 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/