S.Sarvothaman v. Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.05.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S. Sarvothaman

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Commissioner of police Office of The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

2. The Inspector of Police, J6. Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041.

3. R. Palanisamy

4. Mohandaskaramchand Gandhi ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith give necessary Police protection to the petitioner to protect his property measuring 49 cents comprised in old Paimash No. 345A, corresponding to S.F.89/2 at Thiruvanmiyur Village, Thiruvanmiyur Chennai -41 by considering and passing necessary orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 01.05.2023.

For Petitioner : Mr. K. Selvaraj For Respondent : Mr.S. Santhosh Govt. Advocate( Crl Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the first and second respondents to give necessary Police protection to the petitioner to protect his property measuring 49 cents comprised in old Paimash No. 345A, corresponding to S.F.89/2 at Thiruvanmiyur Village, Thiruvanmiyur Chennai -41 by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01.05.2023.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner of the property situated at old Paimash No. 345A measuring 49 cents comprised, corresponding to S.F.89/2 at Thiruvanmiyur Village, Thiruvanmiyur Chennai -41 . While so, the private respondents are creating problem with regard to the title of the subject property and attacked the petitioner and her husband. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation on 01.05.2023 to the second respondent to provide police protection. Since, the said representation has not been

considered till date, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the private respondents herein have no right over the subject property.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that petitioner's representation will be considered on merits and in accordance with law.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court directs the official respondents to issue notice to the petitioner and the private respondents and aggrieved parties if any and conduct enquiry and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

04.05.2023 Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order smn

To

1. The Commissioner of police Office of The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

smn Crl.O.P.No.10204 of 2023 04.05.2023