A Veerapandian v. M/S.Thirunindra Narayanan Finance And Investment Pvt Ltd

A.No.2504 of 2020 in C.S.No.158 2002 & C.S.No.340 of 2003 A.No.2504 of 2020 in C.S.No.158 of 2002 & C.S.No.340 of 2003 N.SESHASAYEE. J., The counsel for the plaintiff submitted that there was no negotiations from the defendants to compromise the matter. The suit is close to two decades old and this Court therefore records there is no settlement. 2.Post the matter before the learned Additional Master No.I for resumption of trial. The master is required to give top priority to the trial, since there is an urgency for this Court to dispose of it within a stipulated time. 3.The parties are required to cooperate in the trial. Since the Court is not under any perennial obligations to pray litigants to participate in trial. It should not be forgotten that it is the Court which has to account for the pendency and not the litigants or lawyers. This Court owes much greater responsibility to the tax payers of this country. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

A.No.2504 of 2020 in C.S.No.158 2002 & C.S.No.340 of 2003 N.SESHASAYEE, J.

kas / dk 4.Therefore, if anyone does not intend to take the trial seriously, they are told that they will forfeit the right to participate in the trial forthwith. 5.Since the case rather ancient, other application viz. A.No.2504 of 2020 is closed.

27.09.2021 kas / dk A.No.2504 of 2020 in C.S.No.158 of 2002 & C.S.No.340 of 2003 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/