← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14492/2023disposed of

A.T. Jayakimar v. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police

2023-05-04Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.05.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN A.T.Jayakumar

...Petitioner

-Vs1. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Villupuram,

2. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram,

3. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Tindivanam Police Station, Tindivanam,

4. J.Kalaichelvan

5. J.Panneerselvam

6. P.Gopinath ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No. 1 to 3 to give adequate police protection for the life and limb of petitioner's family during laying boundary stones and construction compound wall in the property situated at S.No.269/12, Grama Natham Gidangal-1,

Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District of an extent of 670 sq. ft. For Petitioner : Mr.C.N.Raman For Respondents For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for direction to direct the respondents No. 1 to 3 to give adequate police protection for the life and limb of petitioner's family during laying boundary stones and construction compound wall in the property situated at S.No.269/12, Grama Natham Gidangal-1, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District of an extent of 670 sq. ft.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.

3.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Writ Petition, this Court is inclined to direct the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.04.2023, after issuance of

notice to the petitioner and the counter parties viz., the respondents 4 to 6 herein and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. If the representation is not available with the third respondent, the petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the same to the third respondent.

4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost.

04.05.2023 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order rts To

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Villupuram,

2. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram,

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, rts

3. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Tindivanam Police Station, Tindivanam,

4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

04.05.2023