Paramasivam, v. Sellammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.Nos.575 & 577 of 2016 & C.M.P. Nos. 10541 & 10545 of 2016

1. Paramasivam

2. Mani (died)

3. Meenathal

4. Soundaram

5. Dinesh Kumar

6. Venkateshwaran ... Appellants in S.A. No.575 of 2016

1. Karuppusamy

2. Mani (died)

3. Meenathal

4. Soundaram

5. Dinesh Kumar

6. Venkateshwaran ... Appellants in S.A. No.577 of 2016 Appellants 3 to 6 brought on record as LRs of the 2nd appellant vide court order dated 08.04.2022 made in C.M.P. Nos 17446, 17447, 17448, 17449, 17450 & 17451 of 2016 in S.A. No.575/2016.

vs.

1. Sellammal

2. Rajamani

3. Manickam ... Respondents in both S.As 1/3

COMMON PRAYER : Second Appeals filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 21.04.2014 in A.S.No.53 and A.S. No.36 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, upholding the decree and judgment in O.S.No.102 of 2002 and O.S. No.103 of 2002 dated 11.10.2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Palladam.

For Appellants : No appearance (in both S.As) For R1 to R3 : Mr. D. Charles Muthu Shanthan (in both S.As) COMMON JUDGMENT When the second appeals came up for hearing on 08.03.2023, there was no representation for the appellants and hence the Registry was directed to post these matters under the caption "for dismissal' on 09.03.2023. Even today, i.e., 09.03.2023, there is no representation for the appellants.

2. In view of the same, both the Second Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.

09.03.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bga To 2/3

1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.

2. The District Munsif, Palladam.

3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras. 3/3

R. HEMALATHA, J.

bga S.A.Nos.575 & 577 of 2016 & C.M.P. Nos. 10541 & 10545 of 2016 09.03.2023 4/3