← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl./833/2026disposed of

Baby Natarajan v. The District Collector,

2026-06-03Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Baby Natarajan W/o. Natarajan, No.10/23, Murugappa Street, Thiruvallikeni, Chennai - 600 005.

..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector, No.62, Rajaji Salai, 4th Floor, Chennai - 600 001.

2. The Tahsildar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR), Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119.

3. The Inspector of Police, H12, Kanathur Police Station, East Coast Road, Muthukadu, Chennai - 603 112.

..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd Respondent to give adequate police protection for 2nd Respondent to complete the survey in field No.156B, situated at Sholinganallur Taluk, totally to an extent of 2,400 sq.ft, within the stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.V.Adith Narayan For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 3rd Respondent to give adequate police protection to enable the 2nd Respondent to complete the survey of the property comprised in Survey Field No.156B, situated at Sholinganallur Taluk, measuring a total extent of 2,400 sq.ft, within the time stipulated by this Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had purchased the property comprised in Survey Filed No.156B, measuring an extent of 2,400 sq.ft., from one Mr.Raja Mansingh, represented by his duly authorized Power Agent, namely, Mrs.Jeyanthi Krishnamoorthy, through a valid and registered Sale Deed bearing document No.241 of 1997 dated 22.01.1997. Pursuant to the said purchase, the revenue records have been duly mutated in favour of the petitioner.

3. While so, certain third parties allegedly interfered with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. Hence, the petitioner submitted an application before the second respondent seeking survey of the

land by remitting the requisite fees. Pursuant thereto, the second respondent initiated steps to conduct the survey. However, the Surveyor was unable to complete the survey due to obstruction caused by third parties.

4. In view of the above, if the Surveyor faces any obstruction while conducting the survey of the petitioner's property, upon a request being made, the third respondent / Inspector of Police shall enquire into the matter and pass appropriate orders for providing adequate police protection to enable the survey to be conducted, strictly in accordance with law.

5. With the above directions, this writ petition (criminal) stands disposed of. No costs.

03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order av To

1. The District Collector, No.62, Rajaji Salai, 4th Floor, Chennai - 600 001.

2. The Tahsildar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR), Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119.

3. The Inspector of Police, H12, Kanathur Police Station, East Coast Road, Muthukadu, Chennai - 603 112.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

av 03-06-2026